Tags: Identity Family EssayUniversity Of Alberta Letter Of Reference To Support Application For Graduate AdmissionSummary Of Essay On CriticismWriting A Short Literature ReviewCollege Essay Written While HighShould Animal Be Kept In Zoo EssayOutline For Research Paper On LiteratureMers Assignment Of MortgagePropaganda In Nazi Germany Essay
The papers are mainly evaluated with regard to soundness of research questions and appropriateness/correctness of study design, data analysis, and threats to validity. For papers reporting on the application of some solutions, lessons learned are particularly important.New: Scientific evaluation papers must not 10 pages for the main body, and 2 additional pages for the references.In their initial submission, the authors are invited to consider reserving some space (about 0.5 to 0.75 page) in order to more easily implement the changes requested by the reviewers for the final version.
However, please ensure that the abstract conveys more than just an overview of the context and objectives so that readers do not have to read the article in its entirety to learn key conclusions or how those conclusions were reached.
In order to guide the reviewing process, all authors who intend to submit a paper must first submit the title, abstract (max. Abstracts are used only to point out your interest to submit a full paper and to allow us to initiate the search for possible reviewers early in time.
The goal of double-blind reviewing is to ensure that the reviewers can read and review your paper without having to know who any of the authors are, and hence avoid related bias.
It is not about making the authors’ identity undiscoverable.
There are 3 main kinds of solutions and corresponding evaluation criteria: Scientific evaluation papers evaluate existing problem situations or evaluate real-world artifacts or validate/refute proposed solutions by scientific means.