Organic And Conventional Farming Essay

Organic And Conventional Farming Essay-54
These developments have had a positive impact on the availability of organic food in local markets, which enables more people to enjoy benefits of eating organic (chemical-free) food.But just like any other way of farming, organic agriculture also has its downsides.The difference varies widely across crop types and species, however.

These developments have had a positive impact on the availability of organic food in local markets, which enables more people to enjoy benefits of eating organic (chemical-free) food.But just like any other way of farming, organic agriculture also has its downsides.The difference varies widely across crop types and species, however.

Jonathan Foley of the University of Minnesota's Institute on the Environment.

What's more, when best management practices are used for organic crops, overall yields are just 13% lower than conventional levels.

Even though organic farming has been around since the Neolithic period, when our ancestors turned from hunters and gatherers to farmers, there is no doubt that it is experiencing a bit of a comeback in recent years.

The main reason behind this growth in popularity is that the majority of consumers take into consideration the health benefits of chemical-free products, care about animal welfare and make conscious choices to prevent further environmental degradation.

That is particularly true for cereals, which are staples of the human diet -- yet the yield gap is much less significant for certain crops, and under certain growing conditions, according to the researchers. Although organic techniques may not be able to do the job alone, they do have an important role to play in feeding a growing global population while minimizing environmental damage, according to researchers at Mc Gill University and the University of Minnesota.

concludes that crop yields from organic farming are generally lower than from conventional agriculture."To achieve sustainable food security we will likely need many different techniques -- including organic, conventional, and possible 'hybrid' systems -- to produce more food at affordable prices, ensure livelihoods to farmers, and reduce the environmental costs of agriculture," the researchers conclude.Overall, organic yields are 25% lower than conventional, the study finds.That is particularly true for cereals, which are staples of the human diet -- yet the yield gap is much less significant for certain crops, and under certain growing conditions, according to the researchers.The study, which represents a comprehensive analysis of the current scientific literature on organic-to-conventional yield comparisons, aims to shed light on the often heated debate over organic versus conventional farming.Some people point to conventional agriculture as a big environmental threat that undercuts biodiversity and water resources, while releasing greenhouse gases.Others argue that large-scale organic farming would take up more land and make food unaffordable for most of the world's poor and hungry.With ever-increasing awareness about toxic chemicals used extensively in modern agriculture, more people are willing to pay higher prices for organically produced food.According to the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (Fi BL), the demand for organic products is constantly on the rise, which makes this way of farming economically interesting for farmers; India is in the lead when it comes to the number of organic producers, while Australia has the largest proportion of organically farmed land (over 22.7 million hectares) worldwide .For example: uses the following pattern of crop rotation to achieve a healthy balance of nutrients in their soils.In the first year, they plant corn, followed by oats and then use the land for 6 years as a pasture for livestock.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Organic And Conventional Farming Essay

The Latest from vkusnosup.ru ©