In short, the meta-analysis and the integrative review can be considered as two forms of systematic literature review. The first step of every meta-analysis is a systematic review. Further research is necessary to identify or establish the evidence base for these techniques so that in case of favorable outcomes, their use by osteopathic physicians is justified as adjunctive modalities when encountering a patient with pertussis.Tags: Operation Business PlanWhat Makes A Good Friend EssayProblem Solving For Second GradeGood Conclusion To EssayAccounting EssayAn Assimilation Essay On A Raisin In The SunPersonal Essay About MusicBusiness Plan For Computer ShopResource Assignment Matrix
It usually includes only quantitative studies although some sources suggest that it can include both quantitative and qualitative studies.
This type of review aims to overcome possible biases by following a strict method.
Your findings and data are then synthesized and interpreted. It combines the findings of multiple scientific studies and statistically analyzes them.
This method is based on a premise that similar studies will have a common truth, but that individual studies have a degree of error.
Doing a comprehensive literature review is usually a part of any research process.
When you start with your study, you first need to perform a thorough review of previous research so you can build on what is already available.In integrative review, these six phases are followed: There are a lot of similarities between a systematic and integrative review. Some consider the latter to be yet another form of systematic review, which can be performed when one cannot do a meta-analysis. Commonly identified OMT techniques included mobilization techniques, lymphatic pump techniques, and other manipulative techniques predominantly in the cervical and thoracic regions.The wealth of OMT techniques for patients with pertussis that were identified suggests that pertussis was commonly treated by early osteopaths.Therefore, by combining the studies and applying statistic methods, you reach a higher statistical power than you would with a single study.For this type of analysis, studies that fit the research question are identified.The time frame within which the literature was selected is usually defined (for example, you can focus on studies that were published between 20).Once you have predetermined your timeframe, relevant studies within that period are selected and evaluated for their validity.The 24 identified sources included 8 articles and 16 book contributions from the years 1886 to 1958.Most sources were published within the first quarter of the 20th century.