However, in their January 8, 2006, column in The New York Times Magazine, Dubner and Levitt wrote of questions about Stetson Kennedy's research ("Hoodwinked", pp.Tags: Palo Alto Business Plan ProFranchise Model Business PlanEssay On Responsibility Of Towards ParentsSample Literature Review ExampleEssays On John F. Kennedy Inaugural SpeechEssay Critiquing SpeechThesis Statement Jfk Inaugural
The book's chapters cover: One example of the authors' use of economic theory involves demonstrating the existence of cheating among sumo wrestlers.
In a sumo tournament, all wrestlers in the top division compete in 15 matches and face demotion if they do not win at least eight of them.
Israeli economist Ariel Rubinstein criticized the book for making use of dubious statistics and complained that "economists like Levitt ...
have swaggered off into other fields", saying that the "connection to economics ...
This paper has sparked much controversy, to which Levitt has said "The numbers we're talking about, in terms of crime, are absolutely trivial when you compare it to the broader debate on abortion.
From a pro-life view of the world: If abortion is murder then we have a million murders a year through abortion.
The book is a collection of articles written by Levitt, an expert who had gained a reputation for applying economic theory to diverse subjects not usually covered by "traditional" economists.
In Freakonomics, Levitt and Dubner argue that economics is, at root, the study of incentives.
In the "Revised and Expanded Edition" this embellishment was noted and corrected: "Several months after Freakonomics was first published, it was brought to our attention that this man's portrayal of his crusade, and various other Klan matters, was considerably overstated ...
we felt it was important to set straight the historical record." Freakonomics has been criticized for being a work of sociology or criminology, rather than economics.