This essay asks how do male stereotypes affect the manner in which males engage with gender equality?
By encouraging males to analyse their socially constructed gender profiles, it is possible to educate them on how their social roles may impact gender equality.
genitalia at birth or chromosomal typing before birth’. The terms gender and sex are often understood to be the same thing and used interchangeably. However, this only serves to conflate biological anatomy with socially constructed identities.
The problem with this misconception is that in societies, such as those in the West, it is assumed that the reproductive function of males and females is a sufficient basis for prescribing psychological and behavioural characteristics onto members of society. In response to this, Peterson and Runyan assert that: ‘… it is perfectly feasible for gender to change while biological sex remains the same’. Gender should be considered an adjustable and fluid concept, as opposed to the more static disposition of biology.
Public and international discourse on the debate for gender equality focuses on the oppression of women, as it rightly should.
However, the influence that traditional male stereotypes have on the perpetuation of gender inequality, at a transnational scale, also needs to be addressed.
The gendering of the sexes produces and sustains socially constructed differences. Men and women are constructed to behave and interact in ways that perpetuate their gendered identities.
However, there is a vital distinction at work here, one that will underpin this essay — the difference between sex and gender.
that the effect of culture is to transform and channel biology and instinct in particular ways’. Thus, the psychological differences between males and females are mostly, if not entirely, socially constructed. In his paper titled, , Goldberg argues that the cognitive and behavioural differences between men and women are established through their respective physiologies, and that society and gender are a reflection of biological realities. Moir and Jessel also advocate for biological determinism, arguing that to proclaim that men and women ‘…
are the same in aptitude, skill, or behaviour is to build a society based on a biological and scientific lie’, and that biological reality reveals a comparative relationship of sexual asymmetry. The argument raised by Goldberg, Moir, and Jessel is allegedly based on solid scientific findings.