Conclude Level History Essay

It forgets, however, the many different histories that Jordanians champion, histories that the Hashemite mythology has never been able to fully reconcile.”This is an effective conclusion because it moves from the specific argument addressed in the body of the paper to the question of why that argument matters. Ask yourself if the sentence you have written can apply in any time or place or could apply to any event or person.If the answer is yes, then you need to make your opening line more specific.- “Since 1921, when the British first created the mandate of Transjordan and installed Abdullah I as its emir, the Hashemite rulers have faced a dual task in nation-building.”- This is a stronger opening line because it speaks precisely to the topic at hand.The paper prompt is not asking you to talk about nation-building in general, but nation-building in one specific place.“This has been especially true in the Middle East, where the country of Jordan offers one example of how states in the region approached nation-building.Second, given the arbitrary boundaries of the new nation, the Hashemites had to establish the legitimacy of Jordan itself, binding together the people now called ‘Jordanians.’ To help them address both challenges, the Hashemite leaders crafted a particular narrative of history, what Anthony Smith calls a ‘nationalist mythology.’ By presenting themselves as descendants of the Prophet Muhammad, as leaders of the Arab Revolt, and as the fathers of Jordan’s different tribal groups, they established the authority of their own regime and the authority of the new nation, creating one of the most stable states in the modern Middle East.”The first draft of the introduction, while a good initial step, is not strong enough to set up a solid, argument-based paper.Here are the key issues: “One of the most important tasks the leader of any country faces is how to build a united and strong nation.”- This first sentence is too general.Second, given the arbitrary boundaries of the new nation, the Hashemites had to establish the legitimacy of Jordan itself, binding together the people now called ‘Jordanians.’ To help them address both challenges, the Hashemite rulers crafted a particular narrative of history, what Anthony Smith calls a ‘nationalist mythology.’”- This stage-setting is stronger because it introduces the reader to the problem at hand.Instead of simply saying when and why Jordan was created, the author explains why the manner of Jordan’s creation posed particular challenges to nation-building.From the beginning of your paper, you want to invite your reader into your specific topic, rather than make generalizations that could apply to any nation in any time or place.Students often run into the problem of writing general or vague opening lines, such as, “War has always been one of the greatest tragedies to befall society.” Or, “The Great Depression was one of the most important events in American history.” Avoid statements that are too sweeping or imprecise.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Conclude Level History Essay

The Latest from vkusnosup.ru ©