The big bang models - the cosmological models based on general relativity - tell us that the early universe was extremely hot and dense.At the earliest stages that can be modelled using current physical theories, the universe was filled with radiation and elementary particles - a hot plasma in which energy was distributed evenly.As the universe cools, the matter content changes - new particles are formed out of the preexisting ones, such as protons and neutrons forming out of quarks.Tags: School Argumentative Essay TopicsUniversity Of Leicester Thesis BindingNancy Gibbs EssayCompare And Contrast Literary EssayA Good Outline For A Research PaperDissertation Ideas History
The test for any theory is how well it does empirically.
As it stands you have advanced a pet theory, without any mathematical model or analysis.
Taking into account a wealth of nuclear reactions similar to the ones pictured above, one can then apply general statistical formula which govern the relative abundances of the different matter constituents.
What nuclei are produced, and in what amounts, is the result of a race between the various nuclear reactions on the one hand and the inevitable cooling that accompanies the expansion of the universe on the other.
Following such experiments, the properties of the relevant nuclear reactions are very well known.
Physicists can base their calculations on solid experimental data when they want to describe reactions like the one pictured here: The image illustrates two of the nuclear reactions occuring during Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: It shows protons and neutrons combining to form deuterium nuclei (D, containing one proton and one neutron), accompanied by the emission of high energy photons (denoted as γ); furthermore, it shows two deuterium nuclei fusing to produce one nucleus of helium-3 (with two protons and one neutrons) and one free neutron.Big bang nucleosynthesis did not happen "close to the inflationary period". And, significantly, nucleosynthesis occurred after inflation, so can't be the cause of inflation.As for dark energy, nobody has any real model for it.Stack Exchange network consists of 175 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.Visit Stack Exchange Further thoughts: The metaphor for the expansion of the universe is often described as an inflating balloon, but could it be equally valid to think of expansion as matter falling into its own gravity well, away from infinity minus other matter within its gravity field.Eventually, on a cosmic scale, atomic decay would release the confined energy and the energy would return to infinity, creating the appearance of a contracting universe that restarts the Big Bang.If this idea is reality it would create a geodesically complete cosmology. In relative terms, the ratio of the age of the universe now, to 10 seconds is much much smaller than the ratio of 10 seconds to ^$s.As it expanded, it cooled, and the quark-gluon plasma ‘froze’ into neutrons and protons (and other hadrons, but their role in BBN was marginal), which interacted furiously … The universe continued to cool, and soon became too cold for any further nuclear reactions …the unstable isotopes left then decayed, as did the neutrons not already in some nucleus or other.Check out this Astronomy Cast episode, tailor-made for this Guide to Space article: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars.Definition of Nucleo Synthesis:- The procedure in which from old or existing atoms (mostly protons and neutrons) newer atoms are created out of them. In Short this was overall responsible for the formation or the starting of the Big Bang .